HELICOPTER ATTACK REMINISCENT OF VIETNAM
The day after
the
fire Larry Potts, then Assistant Director of the FBI's Criminal
Division,
expressed what was surely the FBI's prime reason public reason for
going
forward with the April 19, 1993 gas and tank assault, "These people had
thumbed their noses at law enforcement"2/--and the authority of law
enforcement,
from the FBI to Attorney General Janet Reno to President Bill
Clinton--had
to be enforced. However, there is evidence there was another
reason,
one the FBI refuses to admit.
Few Americans
realize a simple truth about BATF's raid, one that the government has
tried
to suppress and the press has discounted or ignored: in the first
minutes
of the raid National Guard helicopters zoomed in on Mount Carmel, guns
blazing, like Americans raiding a Vietnam village in that far off
war.
Davidians claim that four of their group were killed by firing from
these
helicopters. David Koresh's unarmed father-in-law, who stood
behind
him at the front door, was also mortally wounded by gunfire from BATF
agents
on the ground.
Like Koresh, BATF
agents knew that if Mount Carmel, whose roofs and walls contained
evidence
of this helicopter attack, was left standing, the Davidians stood an
excellent
chance of being acquitted of murder of federal agents by a sympathetic
jury. And, in fact, those who survived were acquitted of murder.
Moreover, BATF
agents could face prosecution and imprisonment for negligent or even
intentional
homicide in the deaths of the unarmed Davidians. FBI agents took
over from BATF and befriended and sympathized with BATF agents who had
seen four comrades killed and 20 wounded. It is likely FBI
agents,
conspiring either silently or explicitly with BATF agents, deliberately
sabotaged negotiations with the Davidians to prevent their exiting
Mount
Carmel. The ravages of time, wind and rain alone would destroy
some
of that evidence of illegal gunfire. Moreover, agents may have
hoped
to create an incident or situation that would give them an excuse to
destroy
the building and its incriminating evidence. If that meant the
massacre
of dozens of men, women and children--all witnesses to the brutal
attack--so
be it. The possibility that one or two Davidians, in a foolish
act
of self-defense, lighted one of the fires that consumed the building is
the least likely scenario.
Unfortunately,
the Davidians played into BATF and the FBI's hands by not
surrendering.
Davidians sincerely believed the BATF attack was God's way of helping
them
spread His word. They were righteously angered by the unjust
attack,
especially given David Koresh's earlier invitation to BATF to inspect
his
guns. They were fearful that federal agents would destroy
evidence
of BATF crimes once they exited the building. And they worried
that
over a hundred men, women and children would be rendered homeless and
lose
their church if they were to exit without legal reassurances they could
keep the property. For all these reasons Davidians stubbornly
refused
to leave their home--until the FBI made it impossible for them to
escape
alive.
In the video "The
Waco Incident: The True Story," controversial investigator Gordon Novel
asserts, "That's America's first Auschwitz right there. They're
gassing
them prior to cremating them." The massacre of the Branch
Davidians
was the greatest government massacre of civilians on American soil
since
the massacre of 300 Native Americans at Wounded Knee in 1890.
There
are hundreds of disturbing questions about this massacre that must be
answered.
IS AMERICA BECOMING A POLICE STATE?
Many Americans
see BATF's paramilitary raid upon the Branch Davidians, and the FBI's
harsh
51 day siege and brutal April 19th gas and tank attack, as evidence
that
the United States is far down the road toward becoming a police
state.
Government critic William Norman Grigg writes: "The government's
approach
to the Waco confrontation--shoot in haste and invent a justification at
leisure--is that of the police state. Once the precipitate
assault
on the sect had resulted in deaths, the government claimed that those
deaths
justified the raid, in spite of the fact that the raid had caused those
deaths." Grigg notes that while in a free society "laws are
relatively
few and easily understood," in a totalitarian police state "laws are
plentiful
and frequently unintelligible, and the state can intervene at whim into
a person's private affairs."3/
As we shall see,
the Davidians were accused of running afoul of "unintelligible laws"
and
assaulted despite their attempts to cooperate with authorities and make
sure they were in compliance with those laws. While the
government
alleges it discovered a number of illegal weapons in the ruins of the
Davidians'
home, many Americans suspect these weapons actually were manufactured
"at
leisure" by the government to "justify" their raid.
The War on Drugs
The government's
most successful excuse for violating Americans' rights has been the
"War
On Drugs," a war which is largely responsible for the government's
stepped
up "War on Guns." Much of today's violent crime is
prohibition-related,
the prohibition of psychoactive drugs instead of alcohol. The
attraction
of hefty illegal profits has led to even greater struggles over
territory
and violence between armed gangs than that during alcohol
prohibition.
Drug-related crime and the profit-driven promotion of drug use has hit
inner cities the hardest, even as law enforcement has concentrated its
efforts on arresting and imprisoning African-American and Latino users
and dealers.
The War on Drugs
has led to serious abuses of Americans' constitutional rights by law
enforcement:
use of unreliable informants, inadequate investigation of alleged
crimes,
increasing use of entrapment, judicial rubber-stamping of search
warrants,
growing use of unjustified "no knock" warrants, improper use of deadly
force, increasing violations of due process of law, chipping away at
the
exclusionary rule against using illegally obtained evidence, improper
use
of forfeiture proceedings to augment law enforcement budgets, unjust
mandatory
sentencing guidelines and growing use of the military in domestic law
enforcement.
The War on Guns
Drug-prohibition-related
gun violence has resulted in more laws and stricter enforcement of laws
restricting gun ownership. Gun ownership is being added to a
growing
list of "victimless" crimes. In 1994, after many years of effort,
gun control advocates pushed the Brady Bill handgun registration law
through
Congress. The 1993 crime bill banned the further manufacture,
transfer
or possession of 19 types of semi-automatic weapons (so-called
"assault"
weapons) and firearms magazines that exceed ten rounds. However,
though it permitted transfer or possession of weapons or magazines
produced
before September 13, 1994, the day President Bill Clinton signed the
bill
into law. It also outlawed the use of more than two attachments
to
a semi-automatic rifle that has the ability to accept a detachable
magazine.
The one exception to these prohibitions, of course, is continued
manufacture
of semi-automatic weapons for the military and for civilian law
enforcement.
Gun control advocates continue to propose more restrictive laws and
taxes
on guns and ammunition, including registration of semi-automatic guns
and
eventually all guns. They even hope to repeal of the Second
Amendment.
However, both
a federal statute--Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986,
§21--and
a judicial decision--United States vs. Anders, 885 F.2d 1248 [5th Cir.
1989]--hold that there is nothing per se wrong with the ownership of
large
numbers of legal arms. Obviously, the decision and the statute
have
not reined in BATF. During the April 28, 1993 House Judiciary
Committee
hearing on Waco, then-BATF Director Stephen Higgins defended the
tactics
used at Waco by stating, "In the 18 months prior to the Branch Davidian
incident, ATF Special Response Teams had carried out 341 actual
activations
to high risk situations," including "diverse sects and
survivalists."4/
What he did not mention, but what is well known among Second Amendment
activists, is that most of those raided were not criminals using guns
for
illegal purposes, but honest and peaceful citizens. Whether they
break gun laws out of ignorance, because they are "set up" by BATF
agents
or informants--and even if they have broken no law at all--BATF too
often
treats American gun owners like dangerous criminals.
Several cases
of BATF abuses have gained wide notoriety. In December, 1991
agents
raided and trashed John Lawmaster's unoccupied home, found nothing
illegal
and left without shutting the door, leaving guns and ammunition strewn
about the unsecured home.5/ In May, 1992 BATF raided the home of
Louis Katona, a part-time police officer. They confiscated his
legal
machineguns and abused his wife. Later a district judge dismissed
the charges because he could find no evidence a crime had been
committed.6/
In February, 1993 BATF agents raided and ransacked Janice Hart's home
and
interrogated her for an hour without reading her rights, only to
discover
they had the wrong name and address.7/ In a 1994 fishing
expedition,
BATF agents raided the home of Harry Lamplugh, the largest gun show
promoter
in the northeast, refused to let him take his cancer medication, and
caused
the deaths of three family cats.8/
Virginia attorney
and weapons expert Stephen Halbrook asserts that in over one hundred
cases
BATF actually has manufactured evidence that semi-automatic AR-15s
illegally
have been converted to automatic. Agents do so because they have
quotas of convictions they must fill to protect their jobs and gain
promotions
and sometimes can do so only by fabricating evidence. By
definition,
a semi-automatic weapon shoots only one bullet with one pull of the
trigger;
it "automatically" loads the next bullet. An automatic weapon
includes
the automatic loading feature and fires two or more bullets with one
pull
of the trigger. BATF agents simply remove disconnectors, or
safety
switches, that prevent automatic fire. Doing this does not make a
very effective weapon. But if the weapon fires only two shots
with
one pull of the trigger and then permanently jams, BATF still can claim
the weapon is automatic and prosecute the gun owner.9/
Government's Dangerous Paranoia
In the weeks
following
the bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building, President Clinton
and
the establishment media flayed the "paranoia" of "right wing conspiracy
theorists." However, it is the United States government which is
becoming
increasingly paranoid of a citizenry fed up with ever rising taxes and
ever encroaching rules and regulations enforced with increasing levels
of government violence.
The Treasury
Department
report states: "The raid by ATF agents on the Branch Davidian compound
resulted from its enforcement of contemporary federal firearms
laws.
In a larger sense, however, the raid fit within an historic,
well-established
and well-defended government interest in prohibiting and breaking up
all
organized groups that sought to arm or fortify themselves."10/
Tony Cooper, a
law enforcement consultant on anti-terrorism and professor of
negotiations
and conflict resolution at the University of Texas at Dallas, describes
"the formation of a curious crusading mentality among certain law
enforcement
agencies to stamp out what they see as a threat to government
generally.
It's an exaggerated concern that they are facing a nationwide
conspiracy
and that somehow this will get out of control unless it is stamped out
at a very early stage."11/
WEAVER WAS PRACTICE FOR WACO
Many consider
the
BATF entrapment of white separatist Randy Weaver, the 1992 federal
marshal
attack that killed his son, the FBI sniper attack that killed his wife,
and the FBI's eleven day siege to have been merely practice for the
massive
attack against the Davidians. Since the same crew of FBI agents
and
officials are responsible for the massacre of the Davidians, it is
useful
to look closely at that case.
White separatist
Randy Weaver had retreated to rural Idaho with his wife, Vicki, four
children
and a family friend, Kevin Harris.12/ In 1990 a BATF undercover
agent
entrapped Weaver into selling him two illegally sawed-off shotguns for
$300. Weaver alleges BATF charged him after he refused to inform
on other white separatists. The government then gave him the
wrong
date for a court hearing, March 20 instead of February 20, 1991.
Disgusted, Weaver decided to end all contact with the judicial system.
The Eleven Day Standoff
Rather than take
immediate action when Weaver failed to appear, U.S. Marshals began
almost
18 months of surveillance. On August 22, 1992 six marshals, one
equipped
with an assault rifle with a silencer, approached Weaver's cabin in
order
to observe him and threw rocks at his dog in an effort to lure Weaver
closer
so they could arrest him. According to Weaver's attorney Gerry
Spence,
the marshals did not have a warrant--though the U.S. attorney insisted
they did--and they never identified themselves.
When the agents
shot the dog, Harris and Weaver's 14-year-old son Samuel, not knowing
who
the attackers were, ran toward them shooting. Their shots
allegedly
killed U.S. Marshal William Degan--though some assert friendly fire
from
another marshal killed him. Samuel was shot in the back and
killed
as he retreated.
The National Guard
and the FBI Hostage Rescue Team--whose motto is "To Save Lives"--were
called
in. According to court records, the U.S. Marshals falsely told
the
FBI that Weaver himself had ambushed them and that the Weavers and
Harris
would kill anyone who approached them. U.S. Marshals never did
tell
the FBI that Samuel had been killed by a deputy marshal. They did
tell them Mrs. Weaver was a fanatic capable of killing herself and her
own children as an end to the siege.
Finally, U.S.
Marshals never told the FBI that they knew that when the adults went
outside
the cabin they always carried weapons. Larry Potts, Assistant
Director
of the FBI's Criminal Division, authorized "rules of engagement" which
gave snipers the go-ahead to shoot any adult carrying a weapon outside
the cabin. (The standard FBI rules of engagement are: "Agents are
not to use deadly force against any person except as necessary in
self-defense
or the defense of another, when they have reason to believe they or
another
are in danger of death or grievous bodily harm. Whenever
feasible,
verbal warnings should be given before deadly force is applied."13/)
While Weaver may
have suspected he was surrounded by law enforcement after the initial
shootout,
the FBI never officially informed him of it or gave him a chance to
surrender.
And they certainly never warned his family they would be in jeopardy if
any FBI agent saw them armed on the property.
The day after
the first shootings, Harris and Weaver, carrying their guns, left the
cabin
to visit Samuel's body. FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi first shot Weaver
in the shoulder and then tried to shoot Harris. However, he
accidentally
shot Vicki Weaver as she stood in the doorway of the cabin holding her
baby. She died instantly, dropping the baby to the ground.
Harris was wounded by shrapnel. Nevertheless, Weaver and Harris
refused
to surrender to authorities.
During the
standoff
Richard Rogers' Hostage Rescue Team used psychological warfare
techniques
against the Weavers. Court records show that the FBI taunted the
Weavers after Vicki Weaver's death, calling out over their
loudspeakers:
"Good morning, Mrs. Weaver. We had pancakes for breakfast.
What did you have?"14/
Weaver and
Harris surrendered nine days later, after the FBI allowed Populist
Party
presidential candidate Bo Gritz to serve as a third party
negotiator.
The two men were charged with conspiracy to murder federal
officers.
Their trial before a federal jury and U.S. District Judge Edward Lodge
began just five days before the April 19th fire that killed 76
Davidians.
Weaver Acquitted and Prosecutors/FBI Fined
Most of the above
disturbing information came to light during the trial. It also
was
revealed that prosecutors had withheld from the defense for several
months
the information that FBI agents had fabricated evidence by staging
photos.
They also withheld a government agent's notes and a police captain's
assertion
that a U.S. Marshall had shot first. Federal agents falsely
claimed
that Degan had been killed by one of the first shots, but evidence
later
showed he had fired seven shots before he was shot. Judge Lodge
fined
prosecutors $3,240 for "inexcusable delay" in providing this
information.15/
Weaver's defense
attorney, Gerry Spence, did not call any witnesses or present a
defense,
but simply told jurors the government had failed to prove its
case.
In July, 1993 the jury acquitted Weaver and Harris of Degan's murder,
saying
Harris had acted in self-defense. The jury also rejected charges
that the two men conspired to provoke a confrontation with federal
officers.
Weaver was convicted of failing to appear for the original weapons
charge
trial and sentenced to 18 months in prison, with credit for time
already
served. He was freed in early 1994 and sued the federal
government
in the summer of 1994 for the deaths of his son and wife.
After the victory
attorney Gerry Spence told reporters, "A jury today has said that you
can't
kill somebody just because you wear badges and then cover up those
homicides
by prosecuting the innocent." Juror Janet Schmierer of Boise,
Idaho
said, "I think they built their whole scenario out of how they
perceived
someone else should be living their lives, and if someone believed
differently.
. .they must be abnormal."16/ As we shall see, the Justice
Department
and FBI merely disciplined the responsible agents and officials.
HOW THE DAVIDIANS BECAME A TARGET
The Branch Davidians became a target of BATF not because of any solid evidence they possessed illegal weapons, but because former members alleged Davidian leader David Koresh had expressed interest in owning illegal weapons. However, some see an even larger dynamic at work. James R. Lewis writes: ". . .societies need enemies. External threats provide motivations for people to overcome internal divisiveness in order to work together as a unit. . .where external enemies no longer threaten, a society will find groups of individuals within itself that it can construe as threatening and evil."17/
Davidians Made Howell Their Leader
The Branch
Davidians,
an offshoot of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, believe in the
"advent"
or "Second Coming" of Jesus Christ, complete with the end of the world
in a fiery apocalypse, the death of all sinners and the salvation of
true
believers.18/ Davidians believe modern-day living prophets can
lead
church members toward salvation. David Koresh said in one sermon,
"People like dead religions. They want to hear what the Lord said
2000 years ago--and then they want to cut him off at that specific
point
in time."19/
Ben Roden's
"Branch
Davidian" church evolved out of Victor Houteff's Shepherd's Rod Church
in the early 1960s. In 1978 Ben Roden died and his wife Lois
Roden,
a woman well-known in evangelical circles because of her pronouncement
that the Holy Spirit was female, became the new Branch Davidian prophet.
David Koresh's
birth name was Vernon Wayne Howell. He was born August 17, 1959,
was the illegitimate son of a fourteen-year-old girl and, as many have
noted, the grandson of a carpenter. As a boy, he became a
self-taught
student of the Bible who could recite long passages from memory.
His other passion was country and gospel music and he became an able
guitar
player. In 1981, seeking a prophet who could help him grow
spiritually,
he discovered the Branch Davidians and moved to Mount Carmel Center.
Howell's knowledge
of Scripture and personable manner quickly gained him the confidence of
other Davidians. However, his popularity earned him the enmity of
Lois Roden's son George Roden, who considered Howell to be his prime
rival
for the role of leader and prophet. Most Davidians considered
George
Roden to be too poorly versed in Scripture and too erratic to lead the
group and sided with Howell. In 1984 a gun-toting Roden drove
Howell
and his wife Rachel out of Mount Carmel. Over the next two years
most of the remaining Davidians left the Rodens to follow Howell.
They established a community in shacks, tents and buses on property
rented
in Palestine, Texas and also had two homes in LaVerne, California.
Howell visited
Israel in 1985 and, as he explained in a February 28, 1993 KRLD radio
interview,
"an encounter" or, as he told FBI negotiators, "a miraculous meeting
with
God," which instructed him to study and teach the prophecies of the
Seven
Seals of the Book of Revelation.20/ (Davidians have not revealed
the whole meaning of Seven Seals as taught by David Koresh, believing
only
Koresh could teach the truth.)
During these years
Howell also experienced revelations in which God commanded that he
create
a "House of David" where his many wives would bear him children who
would
become the rulers of a purer new world. He began to take young,
single
Davidians as his unofficial wives.
Half of those
who chose to join Vernon Howell were of African, Hispanic or Asian
descent.
Davidians deny that Howell preached and practiced racial separatism, as
some allege. He had two children by an Asian woman and at least
one
wife of African descent. Livingstone Fagan, a black minister from
England, asserts that Davidians had risen above racial concerns or
prejudice.21/
Meanwhile, George
Roden, was nearly alone at Mount Carmel's ramshackle houses. He
was
renting out rooms, including to alleged drug traffickers.22/
(This
fact was used against David Koresh years later.) After Lois
Roden's
death, George Roden challenged Vernon Howell for leadership of the
group.
In late 1987 Roden dug up the coffin of a long-dead Davidian and
challenged
Howell to raise her from the dead. Howell complained to
authorities
about "corpse abuse," but they demanded photographic proof of a crime.
When Howell and
seven armed followers sneaked onto the property to photograph the
coffin,
Roden caught them and a gunfight ensued. Howell and his followers
were charged with attempted murder. Meanwhile, after Roden wrote
letters threatening to afflict U.S. District Judge Walter A. Smith with
herpes and AIDS, Smith sentenced Roden to six months in jail for
contempt
of court.
Howell took this
opportunity to encourage the county to put a lien on Mount Carmel for
16
years of unpaid taxes. Howell paid the taxes on March 22, 1988
and
he and his followers legally re-took Mount Carmel Center. Under
the
agreement with the county, Howell and his Davidians would gain final
control
of the property if they were to occupy it and pay taxes on it for five
years from the date of the agreement. Significantly, that five
year
period would end during the 1993 siege.
In April, 1988
Howell and his followers were tried for attempted murder of Roden;
seven
were acquitted and Howell's trial ended in a hung jury. George
Roden
continued to verbally threaten the group with violence. Then in
1989
Roden murdered a man with an ax and was incarcerated in a mental
institution.
Nevertheless, Davidians feared he would escape and attack them.
They
therefore remained armed and alert. Roden did escape briefly in
late
1993.
In February 28,
1993 KRLD radio interview, David Koresh made the point, "If I say I'm
Christ.
. .the proof is if I can open the seals or not." Those who
believed
he could, stayed. In a March, 1993 New York Times interview,
longtime
follower Paul Fatta unabashedly declared: "I believe David is the
Messiah.
He has shown me over and over that he knows the book and presented
Scriptures
showing how the last days events would happen."23/
Livingstone Fagan,
a social worker and minister who lost his wife and mother in the April
19th fire, holds that "David Koresh was the prophesied instrument
through
whom God spake." Fagan writes that in his first three hours of
listening
to Koresh, "I had perceived more significant biblical truths than I had
done, the entire eight years I had been involved with organised
religion."
He contends that, like David Koresh, those who lived at Mount Carmel
were
"remade" in the "fashion of God."24/
Ruth Riddle
described
the appeal of Mount Carmel to an interviewer, "We were trying to live
together
in community like the early apostles did. Sharing all things,
having
things in common, that's why we lived together, like a family."25/
At the November
22, 1993 American Academy of Religion panel Jamaican Davidian Janet
McBean,
who lost her brother in the April 19th fire, summarized David Koresh's
appeal: "We are spiritual people. And we feel that God is
watching
what happens to this world. That's the reason why David protected
his people and David felt the way he did. . .He felt compelled to give
us the revelation as he did."
Former Members Went to Authorities
Marc Breault,
a Howell follower from 1986 to 1989, swore in a 1990 affidavit: "At
first
Vernon Howell appeared to be a conservative person whose only wish was
to reform the Seventh-Day Adventist Church. As time progressed,
however,
Howell became power-hungry and abusive, bent on obtaining and
exercising
absolute power and authority over the group. . .by 1989, he had lost
all
restraint."26/ Breault was particularly incensed when, in the
fall
of 1989, Howell declared that God had commanded him take the married
women
in the group as his wives.
Soon after,
Breault
left the Davidians and became what he called a "cult buster," devoted
to
the destruction of the Branch Davidians. He charged that Howell
manipulated
members through fear of hellfire, physically abused adults and children
for minor infractions of capricious rules, seduced and impregnated
young
girls, and demanded a willingness to die for him and his
prophecies.
However, Davidians who remained with Howell asserted that Breault's
accusations
were based on words and actions taken out of context and/or blown out
of
proportion and built into fantastic and untrue stories. (After
conducting
an investigation of these accusations which is too extensive to detail
in this book, I largely agree.)
Davidian survivors
charge that Breault had challenged Howell for control of the
group.
Breault replied in November, 1993, "If I was trying to take over the
group
I wouldn't have gone to the authorities. I wouldn't have tried to
have justice done and had the group dismantled."27/
Bent on
"dismantling"
the group, during 1990 Breault managed to convince over a dozen
Davidians
around the world to join his efforts. They signed affidavits
alleging
that Howell was guilty of the statutory rape of two teenage girls, tax
fraud, immigration violations, harboring weapons, child abuse, and
exposing
children to explicit talk about sex and violence. They presented
these affidavits to local police in California and Texas, the Texas
Department
of Public Safety, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the
Internal
Revenue Service. However, these agencies expressed little
interest
in the allegations. Neither did U.S. Assistant Attorney Bill
Johnston,
who later became a prime motivator of the 1993 BATF raid.28/
However,
Breault did not give up his vendetta, which continued even after the
deaths
of most Davidians.
In early 1990
Vernon Howell legally changed his name to David (for King David who
united
Israel in the Old Testament) Koresh (Hebrew for Cyrus, the Persian king
who freed the Jews from Babylon). In October, 1990, Robyn Bunds,
who was living in the California home, decided to leave Koresh with her
son. Koresh immediately sent the child back to Waco, but returned
him when Bunds reported the child missing to police in California.
Bunds
also told police that Koresh was having sex with the underage Aisha
Gyarfas.
When they returned to investigate, Gyarfas and Koresh had returned to
Texas.29/
In September, 1991 Jeannine Bunds, who like her daughter Robyn was
Koresh's
lover, left the Davidians, claiming that she was upset that Koresh had
asked her if she was "capable of killing her children."30/
In the fall of
1991 Breault brought his allegations to the Australian television
producers
of "A Current Affair." Reporter Martin King, who co-wrote
Breault's
book, visited Mount Carmel and interviewed Koresh in January of
1992.
The program that eventually aired portrayed Koresh as a sex-crazed,
gun-loving
religious fanatic. It also provides one of the few inside views
of
Mount Carmel Center and Koresh's preaching style.
In fall 1991
Breault
also informed young Kiri Jewell's father, David Jewell, that Kiri was
slated
to become one of Koresh's wives. Jewell sued for custody, and in
January, 1992 Breault and other former Davidians testified at the
custody
hearing in Michigan. Without admitting any wrong doing, Kiri's
mother
Sherri voluntarily relinquished primary custody and promised to keep
Kiri
away from Koresh during visitations.
Spurred on by
Davidian detractors, on February 27, 1992 Texas Department of Human
Services
social worker Joyce Sparks visited Mount Carmel with two other Human
Services
employees and two McLennan County Sheriff's deputies. Koresh
allowed
the visit to be videotaped.31/ They made two more visits and
Koresh
visited their offices. The case was closed on April 30, 1992 for
lack of evidence of abuse.32/
Davidian
"defectors" eagerly cooperated with BATF and FBI investigators in 1992
and 1993. That as many as twenty former members made various
allegations
to the government and press certainly suggests that some felt
discontent
with David Koresh's leadership of the Branch Davidians. However,
after federal agents' assaults resulted in the deaths of so many of her
friends, Robyn Bunds, who had cooperated with the government, said she
urged that responsible BATF officials should be punished. "I know
there were things going on there that weren't right. But they're
dead now. What's the point?. . .It's Okay to save them, try to do
something, but what you did was kill them."33/ Bunds later joined
in the civil law suit against the government with Koresh's mother,
another
wife, Dana Okimoto, and other survivors and family members.34/
Koresh Predicted the End Was Near
Such
continuing attacks might make the most innocent group paranoid.
It
appears that the mounting pressures on David Koresh in late 1991 and
early
1992--the loss of Kiri Jewell, the television exposé, the child
abuse investigation, and the knowledge that Marc Breault and others
would
continue reporting allegedly illegal activities to authorities,
convinced
Koresh that government agents soon might launch their long prophesied
attack
which would signal the beginning of the apocalypse.
Like many today,
Davidians believed these were the end times and were preparing for
inevitable
tribulations. At trial Davidian Kathryn Schroeder, who
prosecutors
bullied into testifying for the government, revealed that Davidians
began
minimal practice with firearms, but had little idea why they might need
such expertise. Marjorie Thomas, also a Davidian prosecution
witness,
asserted that Koresh taught arms would be needed only for self-defense
against an attack, not to attack the government or force anyone to go
along
with their beliefs.35/
In 1991 Davidians
began tearing down Mount Carmel's separate homes and building one large
building where they could be a more tight knit community, living and
studying
together. After a neighbor's home was destroyed by a tornado,
they
also began building the underground tornado shelter--something which
could
also serve as a shelter should the "beast" burn down Mount
Carmel.36/
In early 1992 Davidians reinforced the front wall of the building with
a two foot high concrete wall to protect them in case someone
attacked.
(Davidians on the first floor actually were protected by this wall
during
BATF's February 28, 1993 attack.)37/
Graeme Craddock
testified to a grand jury that a few Davidians believed that when
welfare
workers visited Mount Carmel there were SWAT teams stationed around the
property.38/ The government insists that Koresh believed a
spring,
1992 police SWAT team training near the Davidians' rented garage, the
Mag
Bag, was BATF training for an assault on Mount Carmel.39/
Kathryn Schroeder
alleged it was about this time Koresh began to stress the prophecies of
Daniel, chapters 11 and 12, regarding the "final confrontation" with
the
"king of the north," the "beast." Koresh taught that if Davidians
were sufficiently faithful to God, they would be "translated" into
heaven
and the kingdom. This translation did not necessarily have to
happen
through their deaths at the hands of the authorities; if they were
obedient
to God they could be translated without dying. In fact, after the
February 28, 1993 attack Koresh chided Davidians that they had not been
so translated during the BATF attack because they were not
obedient.
(Suicide was not one of the options Koresh taught.)40/
On July 30, 1992
BATF investigators visited David Koresh's gun dealer Henry McMahon to
inquire
about Koresh's gun purchases. McMahon called Koresh who invited
agents
to come out immediately and inspect the weapons. They refused but
continued their obvious surveillance, something bound to make Davidians
more suspicious.41/
Kathryn
Schroeder testified that Koresh had called in Davidians from all over
the
world to celebrate Passover of 1992. Predicting that this would
be
the group's last Passover before the fulfillment of prophecy in the
apocalypse,
Koresh decreed that they were "going to enjoy this last summer" and
bought
go-carts, boats, and motorcycles.42/ (It was this gathering which
prompted Marc Breault to claim falsely Davidians were preparing for
"mass
suicide.")
Convinced that
these were the "last days," Schroeder and her husband lied about their
income to obtain a number of credit cards which they used to buy
weapons.
While they did make their monthly payments on the debt, they were
convinced
they would never have to pay it all because they would be "gone by
1995."43/
In late 1992, perhaps beefing up security, Koresh moved the gun room
and
his bedroom from the second story rooms--something BATF did not know
when
they ordered agents to smash into the second floor rooms, leading to
the
deaths of two agents. The guns were moved inside the first story
concrete room (also called the "walk-in" or the "vault") and Koresh
moved
into the fourth floor room of the four story tower.44/
If not for BATF's
unnecessary and unprovoked attack on the Davidians--and in the event of
no universal apocalypse--it is likely that David Koresh would have had
to change his message to adapt to the fact that his prophesies were not
fulfilled. Koresh surely would have lost some followers and even
might have experienced a challenge to his leadership from other
Davidians.
However, BATF's
attack only confirmed to Davidians what David Koresh had been preaching
all along--the "beast" would attack the "Lamb" and God's people and
force
them to defend themselves. And it confirmed their belief that
these
were indeed the last days, and that they should do what they could to
help
Koresh spread God's Word to the world to repent before God made his
final
judgement upon humanity.
Some have said
that Koresh's first prophesying the government would come to attack him
and then collecting a lot of weapons--including allegedly illegal
ones--just
"invited" a government attack; it was a "self-fulfilling
prophecy."
However, this is a smokescreen. The real crime is that the United
States government chose to deal with perceived violations of its laws
with
unnecessary and excessive force at the cost of the lives of 82
Davidians
and four federal agents.
Russian engineer
Ilias Abdonlline told a San Antonio Express-News reporter why he had
come
to Waco to see the ruins of Mount Carmel: "Everyone in the world was
amazed
when this thing happened, but especially when it happened in
America.
We have a terrible history with Stalin in Russia, and I have a memory
with
that. When I saw this on television, I was shocked. How
could
it happen in the U.S.? The U.S. is a democracy."45/ What is
so tragic is that in our modern society the Davidians' biblical fear of
attack by "The Beast" turned out to be a realistic fear and not some
fantastic
interpretation of the Bible!
SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION
The massacre of
the Branch Davidians has spawned a mass of sometimes conflicting
"facts,"
rumors and "conspiracy" theories. The most infamous of these are
those promoted by Indianapolis attorney Linda Thompson in her videos
"Waco,
the Big Lie" and "Waco, the Big Lie Continues." These allegations
include: that the government used a flame-throwing tank to set the
fires,
that the government set fire to the "underground bunker" and people
died
there, that a Davidian who escaped from the front roof and another who
jumped from a second-story room really are government agents, that the
government did not collapse the gymnasium, and that a tank pulled a
body
away from the building. Flaunting such untruths detracts
attention
from the more subtle, but more insidious, real truths.
After the Oklahoma
City bombing, the national media used Thompson's most flagrant and
inaccurate
accusations to try to discredit all assertions that federal agents
committed
crimes against Davidians. Despite these faults, the videos do
contain
enough shocking footage and real truths to have mobilized hundreds of
thousands
of citizens to seek more information about federal crimes against the
Davidians.
This book is a
systematic listing and analysis of government crimes against the Branch
Davidians, culminating in mass murder, and government coverup of those
crimes. I have attempted to present what, given the evidence
available,
seem to be the most accurate facts, the most substantive rumors, and
the
most believable theories. Given my limited resources, some errors
inevitably have crept into the book. This is a story which will
be
corrected and updated for years.
I have drawn on
a variety of sources: wire service, newspaper and magazine reports,
books,
published reports, electronic mail articles and announcements,
government
documents, over 50 hours of video tapes, over 20 hours of radio and
conference
audio tapes, news and government photographs, and personal discussions
and interviews with participants in the events and with other
investigators
and interested parties.
The Treasury
Department's
September 30, 1993 report and the Justice Department's October 8, 1993
report are little more than internal reviews conducted for public
relations
purposes--for neither report were any agents or officials even
interviewed
under oath. Both reports "redacted," i.e., withheld, information
which officials claimed might have affected the prosecution of the
Davidian
defendants accused of conspiracy to murder, and murder of, federal
agents.
Much of this redacted information was never disclosed at trial and
remains
hidden from the American people. These reports are sometimes the
only sources of some important information and when there seems to be
no
apparent reason for the government to falsify or distort information I
have relayed it as if it were true. However, very often the
government
"facts" so blatantly conflict with other, more reliable facts, or with
common sense, that the reports provide excellent evidence of coverup of
federal agents and officials' crimes.
The transcripts
of United States Senate and House of Representatives hearings provided
other useful evidence of the extent to which devious BATF and FBI
agents
and officials withheld, falsified and twisted information to deceive
and
hoodwink relatively uncritical members of Congress. The two House
subcommittees which conducted the 1995 Waco hearings had access to a
great
deal more information than that available in 1993. The hearings
were
held while this book was in the galleys stage. Chapter Thirteen
summarizes
new information revealed, information that only supports the
interpretation
of events described in this book.
Kirk Lyon's Cause
Foundation, former attorney general Ramsey Clark, and Houston's Caddell
& Conwell are handling most of the family and survivor civil suits
federal agents and officials. These lawsuits provide excellent
indications
of what attorneys consider to be evidence of criminal action.
With
their powers of discovery, these attorneys may be able to elicit
significant
evidence from the government, its agents and officials.
Unfortunately,
as the 1994 trial of eleven Davidians illustrated, the government is
eager
to withhold from Davidian attorneys information damaging to BATF, the
FBI
and the Treasury and Justice Departments. Important evidence like
a bullet-ridden metal door, lethal bullets, video and audio tapes and
autopsy
reports, were "missing," damaged or dubious. While the trial
brought
out a great deal of information damaging to the government, and much
exonerating
Davidians, many questions could not be answered because the judge would
"not allow the government to be put on trial." He therefore
barred
admission of important defense evidence and witnesses that might have
proved
government misconduct.
Of course, because
the trial judge promised to throw up procedural barriers to defense
attorneys
calling important witnesses, the unpaid, overburdened attorneys largely
ceased their efforts to bring such important witnesses to the
stand.46/
And it is likely some agents lied on the stand to protect themselves
and
other agents. Referring to BATF supervisors' coverup of the loss
of surprise, one defense attorney said, "While leaders of the ATF, the
supervisors, were telling lies to our nation, what was going on?. .
.They
knew their supervisors were lying, and so their statements, their
comments,
what they told the Rangers, at that particular time, was cemented, at
the
time, and it was cemented in an atmosphere, an atmosphere of lies and
misrepresentations
that they knew were going on, and they went right along with it."47/
Given the mass
of facts, incidents, and personalities involved--and that so much
information
is being covered up by federal agents and officials protecting
themselves
and their comrades--it is clear that only the appointment of an
independent
counsel with a full staff of attorneys and investigators, and full
power
to subpoena witnesses and grant immunity, will get close to the real
truth
about government crimes against the Branch Davidians. We must
work
to assure that the government agents and officials responsible for the
massacre and its coverup are brought to justice--and that the nine
living
victims, the Davidian prisoners, are freed from their prison cells.
1. According to
several Branch Davidians, in the last few years many in the group had
come
to call themselves "Students of the Seven Seals." Surviving
Davidians
have been identifying themselves as "Mount Carmel Survivors."
However,
most continue to accept the use of the term Branch Davidian.
Davidian
survivors hold that 82 in total died, including two unborn children.
2. Stephen Labaton,
"Officials Contradict One Another on Rationale for Assault on Cult,"
New
York Times, April 21, 1993, A1.
3. William Norman
Grigg, "Redefining `Law and Order'," The New American, April 4, 1994,
pgs.
69, 71.
4. From BATF
Director
Stephen Higgins written statement to the April 28, 1993 House Judiciary
Committee hearings. The transcript of this hearing was released
just
before publication. Because descriptions of comments and
quotations
come variously from news reports, video footage and the draft
transcript
of the hearings, I have not footnoted most references to this hearing.
5. National Rifle Association April 19,
1993 press release, "NRA Calls for Congressional Inquiry into Waco
Raid";
James L. Pate, "No Longer Untouchable," American Spectator, August,
1993,
p. 35.
6. James L. Pate,
"Katona Gets His Guns," Soldier of Fortune, April, 1995, pg. 58.
7. National Rife
Association May 10, 1995 press release.
8. Michael Hedges,
"Family recounts terror at hands of ATF agents," Washington Times,
April
13, 1995;
9. Stephen
Halbrook,
private communication, September, 1994.
10. From the Report
of the Department of the Treasury on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
and
Firearms Investigation of Vernon Wayne Howell also known as David
Koresh,
September, 1993, Appendix D, p. 7.
11. Louis Sahagun
and Doug Conner, "Pair Acquitted of Murder in Idaho Mountain Shootout,"
Washington Post, July 9, 1993.
12. Account in
Weaver standoff section drawn from: Associated Press wire story, "U.S.
plods on in case against 2 white separatists in Idaho," May 10, 1993;
Jerry
Seper, "White separatist acquitted in marshal's murder," Washington
Times,
July 9, 1993; Jerry Seper, "FBI's Idaho firefight linked to
misinformation
from marshals," Washington Times, December 1, 1993; Gerry Spence,
"First
They Came for the Fascists," Liberty, January, 1994.
13. FBI Legal
Handbook
for Special Agents, Section 3-6.4.
14. Jerry Seper,
"FBI Agents waged war on minds," Washington Times, September 22, 1993.
15. Associated
press wire story, "Doctored evidence slows trial," Washington Times,
May
27, 1993; James Bovard, "No Accountability at the FBI," Wall Street
Journal,
January 10, 1995.
16. Washington
Times, May 27, 1993.
17. Introduction
to James R. Lewis, Editor, From the Ashes: Making Sense of Waco,
(Lanham,
MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1994), p. xiii.
18. Except where
noted, most information for this section is taken from Clifford L.
Linedecker,
Massacre at Waco, Texas, (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993); Brad
Bailey
and Bob Darden, Mad Man in Waco, (Waco, Texas: WRS Publishing, 1993);
Kenneth
Samples, Erwin de Castro, Richard Abanes, Robert Lyle, Prophets of the
Apocalypse: David Koresh and Other American Messiahs, (Grand Rapids,
MI:
Baker Books, 1994).
19. "Voices
of Fire" audio tape, produced by Junior's Motel Records, Otho, Iowa,
1993.
20. Justice
Department
report, p. 43.
21. Trial
transcript,
p. 4127; Livingstone Fagan paper, "Mount Carmel: The Unseen Reality,"
Appendix
A, August, 1994; Dana Okimoto interview, Kenneth Samples, et al, pgs.
182-189;
Livingstone Fagan, private communication, April, 1995.
22. June 9, 1993,
House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on the Treasury, Postal
Service,
and General Government Appropriations, p. 189.
23. Michael
deCourcy
Hinds, "A believer says cult in Texas is peaceful," New York Times,
March
6, 1993, A1.
24. Livingstone
Fagan paper, August, 1994, p. 7; Livingstone Fagan paper, "Christ,"
1994.
25. "Day 51: The
True Story of Waco" video, produced by UTV, Houston, TX.
26. Brad Bailey
and Bob Darden, p. 134. Unless otherwise noted, most material on
or attributed to Marc Breault is from his book, Inside the Cult,
co-authored
by Martin King, (New York: Signet Books, 1993).
27. "The Maury
Povich Show," November 9, 1993. Povich presented two interview
shows
about the Branch Davidians on November 8 and 9, 1993.
28. Kenneth
Samples,
et al, p. 72.
29. Clifford L.
Linedecker, pgs. 144-147.
30. Newsweek, May
3, 1993, p. 27.
31. Trial
transcript,
p. 5600.
32. Gustav Nieguhr
and Pierre Thomas, "Abuse Allegations Unproven: Koresh was Investigated
in Texas, California," Washington Post, April 25, 1993, A20.
33. Darlene
McCormick,
"Agents didn't take cult arrest advice, ex-Davidians say," Waco
Tribune-Herald,
October 1, 1993.
34. Ramsey Clark
civil suit, (February 25, 1995.)
35. Trial
transcript,
pgs. 4524-26, 4559-69; Marjorie Thomas testimony, November 17-18, 1993,
pgs. 96-96, 102, 130, 153.
36. Trial
transcript,
pgs. 4518-20.
37. Ibid. pgs.
4520, 6392.
38. Ibid. p. 6368.
39. Treasury
Department
report, Appendix D, p. 3; David Aguilera April 18, 1993 affidavit in
support
of search warrant.
40. Trial
transcript,
pgs. 4479, 4558, 6381.
41. James L. Pate,
"Waco: Behind the Cover-Up," Soldier of Fortune, November, 1993, pgs.
36-41,
71-72.
42. Trial
transcript,
p. 4531.
43. Ibid. pgs.
4532-34.
44. Ibid. pgs.
4472, 4492, 4599.
45. Egon Richard
Tausch, court observer article, "The Branch Davidian Trial," 1994.
46. January 6,
1994 trial transcript, pgs. 63-67; trial transcript, p. 5652-53.
47. Trial
transcript,
pgs. 7093-95.