BATF IGNORED DAVIDIAN ATTEMPTS TO COOPERATE
The Treasury report asserts: "Aguilera wisely sought to keep his investigation a secret from David Koresh and his followers. . .[and]. . .sharply circumscribed his inquiries about Koresh to third parties, including arms dealers and former cult members.2/ The report fails to mention Aguilera was not successful. As we have seen, Koresh discovered Aquilera was investigating on July 30, 1993. And the Davidians assumed they remained under surveillance and, through Henry McMahon, invited agents to inspect his weapons immediately. In late January, 1993 after a BATF agent posed as a UPS trainee and attempted to enter the Mag Bag and Mount Carmel Center, David Koresh complained to the local sheriff's department, thinking it was the department trying to infiltrate Mount Carmel.3/
Koresh Had Cooperated with More Serious Investigations
David Koresh had
been investigated on more serious charges than gun law violations and had
cooperated fully with law enforcement. In 1987, when Koresh and seven
Davidians were indicted for attempted murder after the shoot out with George
Roden, the sheriff called Koresh and told him they should turn themselves
in and surrender their weapons. When deputies showed up to arrest
them, they complied. Former McLennan County District Attorney Vic
Feazell, who prosecuted Koresh in that case, criticized federal agents:
"If they'd called and talked to them, the Davidians would've given them
what they wanted."4/
In 1991, when
LaVerne, California police demanded Koresh return their child to Robyn
Bunds, he did so immediately. Koresh and Sherri Jewell cooperated
fully with the Michigan court which awarded primary custody of Kiri Jewell
to her father David. And between February and April, 1992 Koresh
allowed Texas Department of Protection and Regulatory Services and McLennan
County Sheriff's Department personnel to inspect Mount Carmel on three
occasions.
Marjorie Thomas,
also a Davidian prosecution witness, asserted that Koresh taught arms would
be needed only for self-defense against an attack, not to attack the government
or force anyone to go along with their beliefs.5/
However, the Treasury
report falsely claims, "There was, in fact, no evidence that Koresh was
prepared to submit to law enforcement authorities or that he had done so
in the past" and describes his alleged "disdain for fire arms laws and
hatred for those charged with their enforcement."6/
Koresh Invited Sheriff to Inspect Weapons in
1992
In February, 1992
Robert L. Cervenka complained to the sheriff's department that he had heard
machinegun fire at Mount Carmel. According to Aguilera's affidavit,
he even "offered to allow the Sheriff to use his property as a surveillance
post." Several months later Davidians contacted the local sheriff
about this. The New York Times reports, "According to Mr. [Paul]
Fatta, the weapons the Davidians were firing at that time were legal AK-47s
and AR-15s outfitted with a `hellfire trigger' that allowed for rapid firing
without converting the rifles into fully automatic weapons. `We had heard
that one of the neighbors had been approached about using their property
as a listening post, and we went to the local sheriff's department and
asked them if the hellfire triggers were legal, just to make sure.
We were told that they were legal.'"7/ According to another article,
they told the Sheriff, "why don't you come and ask us what we've got."8/
Koresh Befriended Undercover Agent
On January 11,
1993 eight undercover agents were assigned to pose as students living in
the two-bedroom house across the street from Mount Carmel. Davidians
immediately visited that house, but undercover agents refused to let them
come in.9/ Davidians doubted the men were students because they were
too old, their cars were too new, and there was no furniture or clothes
in the house.10/ However, the Davidians remained unsure as to which
government agency had them under surveillance, thinking it could be BATF,
the FBI or the Immigration and Naturalization Service.11/
Davidian survivor
Clive Doyle said Davidians considered the agents "just like everyone else
out there--souls to be saved."12/ Koresh invited agent Robert Rodriquez
("Gonzales") to visit Mount Carmel Center, listen to music, shoot guns
on their target range and attend Bible studies. He even invited him
to join the Branch Davidian community.13/ Davidian Livingstone Fagan
writes: "It was our hope that, by introducing this agent to our faith,
he might communicate its authenticity to his superiors. It was felt
that, since they were not listening to us, the might listen to one of their
own."14/ Koresh told KRLD radio reporters February 28, 1993 that
he was disappointed that after his talks with "Gonzales," he and his superiors
did not "understand" that Koresh was a serious religious person worthy
of "respect."
After the fire
Rodriguez admitted to reporters that Koresh's teachings did affect him.
At the trial Rodriguez at first denied being influenced by Koresh, but
then confirmed telling a reporter Koresh was "close" to converting him.
"He knew what he was talking about. . .after a while, it gets to you, it
affects you. You sit there and listen and it starts to make sense."
Discussing the people he had met at Mount Carmel Center, Rodriguez began
to weep.15/
After Raid, Koresh Stated He Would Have Cooperated
The above evidence
lends credence to David Koresh's claims on the publicly released February
28, 1993 9-1-1 tape that he would have cooperated with authorities if they
had contacted him. On the 9-1-1 tape Koresh told McLennan County
Sheriff's Lieutenant Larry Lynch, "Now, we're willing, and we've been willing,
all this time, to sit down with anybody. You've sent law enforcement
out here before."
Immediately after
the raid, Koresh told a KRLD radio reporter, "I respect law enforcement.
I loved the Waco Sheriff Department. They treated me good.
When we had the child accusations against us, some Sheriff department guys
came out and they treated us with the highest respect. . .They took the
children off where they can talk to them personally. Those kind of
people I can deal with." When the reporter asked if he would have
gone to town and discussed the weapons with the sheriff's department, Koresh
answered, "I would have come. I would have come. I would have
come."
The Houston Chronicle
obtained tapes of telephone conversations between Koresh and BATF agent
Jim Cavanaugh shortly after the assault. Koresh told the agent, "It
would have been better if you just called me up or talked to me.
Then you could have come in and done your work."16/
When federal prosecutor
Ray Jahn asked Davidian Marjorie Thomas, who testified for the prosecution,
what Davidians would have done if agents "had just walked up to the door
and turned the knob and started to walk in?" Thomas answered, "We
wouldn't do anything."17/ And during a prison interview Renos Avraam
asserted, "[Koresh] had let other people in, including policemen.
Why wouldn't he let the ATF in? They never gave him the opportunity.
So we will never know." Livingstone Fagan agreed, "The ATF could
have knocked on the door."18/
QUESTIONABLE GROUNDS FOR A PARAMILITARY RAID
Former New York City Police commissioner Benjamin Ward said of BATF's February 28th raid on Mount Carmel, "They did it backwards. The accepted way is to talk first and shoot second."19/ Dr. Robert Cancro, one of the outside experts the Justice Department asked to review BATF and FBI's actions, wrote, "David Koresh asked why they did not serve him the warrant directly rather than through an armed assault. . .The issue is why was this not considered and evaluated more thoroughly and with adequate behavioral input."20/ While BATF has given insufficient and conflicting reasons for the raid, it seems clear that the Bureau's primary reason was the bureaucratic imperative to extend BATF's operations and budget.
Questions About U.S. Attorney Johnston's Role
Assistant U.S.
Attorney Bill Johnston ignored Marc Breault's complaints against the Davidians
for a number of years. It was not until BATF showed interest in the
David Koresh and the Davidians that he began to aggressively pursue the
case. He would go on to become one of the trial prosecutors.
According to the
Treasury report, Johnston "informed ATF early in the investigation that
he would not authorize a search warrant for the Branch Davidian Compound
if it was to be executed through a siege-style operation. He, too,
feared that a siege strategy would permit Koresh and his followers to destroy
evidence and make prosecution more difficult, as happened in the CSA [Covenant,
Sword and Arm of the Lord] case. Despite Johnston's views, however, ATF's
tactical planners seriously considered a siege plan."21/
At trial defense
attorneys tried desperately to discover whether Johnston in fact had played
such an important role in the decision to go with a dynamic entry (paramilitary
raid) instead of a siege (surrounding Mount Carmel until residents surrendered).
They argued that if U.S. attorneys were involved in promoting the fatal
raid plan, they had a vested interest in showing their actions were proper.
Judge Smith repeatedly frustrated attorneys' efforts by ruling the matter
irrelevant.22/
Johnston
dismissed the information in the Treasury report saying: "The Treasury
Review. . .is a book that was written for release to the public. . .It
is not exactly--it relates to the ATF, as if that had some effect on all
of these people, Buford and others in planning, and it's--the full context
of that is hard to read."23/ Johnston thereby conceded that the Treasury
report was merely a public relations effort, not a serious investigation.
Johnston finally
admitted that the Treasury report reference came from another meeting Johnston
had with BATF raid planner Chuck Sarabyn. "There was a conversation
with Sarabyn, and the quote is not completely accurate, it is just not
explained." Johnston did not go on to explain it and asserted he
had no intention of calling Sarabyn as a witness.24/
Although it is
widely rumored that Johnston observed the February 28, 1993 raid, he refused
to answer specifically defense attorney Mike DeGeurin's question about
his presence. He stated, apparently sarcastically, "I wasn't in one
of the trailers, Mr. DeGeurin."25/
Buford Refused to Reveal Real Reason for Raid
At trial defense
attorneys sharply questioned the highest raid planner prosecutors brought
to the stand, Resident-Agent-in-Charge of Little Rock BATF, Bill Buford.
Buford had planned and participated in the 1985 siege of the white supremacist
group "The Covenant, the Sword and the Arm of the Lord." By the end
of the siege, the group allegedly had destroyed most of its illegal weapons.26/
However, when asked if the Treasury report allegation that this fear influenced
the decision to do a paramilitary raid instead of a siege, Buford replied,
"Absolutely not."27/
Buford testified
that he originally argued for a siege because it was "the safest way to
do it." Buford claimed that he changed his mind and came to support
a paramilitary raid "to protect the women and children." However,
during cross examination Buford admitted that he had no idea how many women,
children and elderly lived at Mount Carmel. Moreover, defense attorneys
discovered that Buford's rough notes about the planning process contained
no mention of concern for women and children.28/
Defense attorneys
sought other planning materials to prove that Buford had lied about his
concern for women and children-- evidence, in their minds, of his being
involved in a BATF coverup. Prosecutors objected vehemently, invoking
"privilege as to the other matters, the attachments to the other plans,
because they do not reflect the reasoning and internal thought of ATF,
this sort of thing, that have nothing to do with guilt or innocence but
instead give away strategy and planning, and how these things are arrived
at and factors considered by ATF, which involved agent safety and risks,
that if they are revealed, it would be detrimental to law enforcement.
. .[these]. . .go beyond what's included in the Treasury Report are clearly
not discoverable."29/
First Test of "National Response Plan"
It is well known
that forceful execution of search warrants is BATF's preferred modus operandi.
The Treasury report acknowledges that BATF planners decided quickly that
their only options were a siege or a paramilitary raid.30/ Raid planner
Bill Buford confessed at trial that he never had been told that Koresh
had invited Aguilera to Mount Carmel to inspect his weapons, something
that would have indicated the viability of a non-violent service of warrant.31/
Two top BATF planners
were particularly predisposed to such a raid. Dallas Special Agent-in-Charge
Ted Royster had led many high profile, aggressive raids.32/ SAC Chuck
Sarabyn, who would become co-commander of the February 28th raid, favored
a raid because it would be the first opportunity to test the "National
Response Plan" which he had "played a significant role in drafting."
This would also be only the fifth time more than one Special Response Team
had been used in an operation.33/ Successful completion of the operation
would be a big boost to BATF's credibility in law enforcement circles.
Given these raid
planners' military mentality, it is understandable that BATF named the
raid "Operation Trojan Horse."34/ Evidently planners, who were hiding
their "troops" in cattle trailers, expected a great surprise victory.
David Koresh's attorney Dick DeGuerin explained that the reason BATF rejected
Koresh's offer to cooperate was to excuse a paramilitary raid. "I
guess you have to understand the Rambo mentality to understand why these
ATF agents and their supervisors wanted to do that."35/
Publicity Stunt to Bolster BATF's Image and
Budget
In early 1993
BATF was a beleaguered agency. Politicians were calling for its abolition,
CBS-TV's "60 Minutes" had just done an exposé about female BATF
agents who charged routine sexual harassment and even attempted rape, black
BATF agents were suing for job discrimination, and the Waco Tribune-Herald
was calling to find out why BATF was not doing something about this "dangerous
armed cult," the Branch Davidians.36/
Facing a March
10, 1993 hearing in front of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on
Treasury, Postal Service and General Government, BATF leadership may have
felt it needed some good publicity to illustrate its effectiveness, justify
its existence and perhaps increase its budget for the kind of paramilitary
operations which it preferred. Arresting dozens of "religious fanatics"
and displaying a big weapons cache might be just the thing. Any later
story that the guns were found to be legal and that charges had been dropped
would never go beyond the local papers. Such publicity also could
be used to justify more gun control laws, which would necessitate an even
bigger BATF budget--and bigger promotions, perks and pensions for BATF
officials and agents.
Mike Wallace reran
the "60 Minutes'" January episode May 23, 1993 and declared, "Almost all
the agents we talked to said that they believe the initial attack on that
cult in Waco was a publicity stunt--the main goal of which was to improve
the ATF's tarnished image." At trial several agents stated that a
lead BATF agent yelled the very publicity-conscious phrase "It's showtime!"
as they exited the trailers.37/
During the June
9, 1993 House Appropriations subcommittee hearings lawmakers grilled BATF
Public Information Officer Sharon Wheeler to determine if BATF Washington
or local offices had been concerned with "the BATF image and whether or
not this operation would impact that image." (Her superior, who also
appeared and probably knew the answer, did not volunteer an answer.)
Wheeler denied two reporters' contentions that when she called them for
weekend phone numbers she had told them, "we have something big going down"
on Sunday.38/ And BATF agents made no attempt to stop the news people
following them on the raid--one television crew followed BATF's cattle
trailers right up the Mount Carmel driveway.
BATF Paranoia and Hostility
Another explanation
for the decision to proceed with a paramilitary raid is BATF's fear of
and hostility towards what Time magazine called "determined and fanatical
groups." BATF spokesperson Jack Killorin declared, "We've gone about
them in a number of different ways--ruse, ambush, siege and talk.
In almost every one we lose law enforcement officers."39/ Marc Breault
writes that in December, 1992 BATF investigator Davy Aguilera told him
"that he felt Vernon was a lunatic and needed to be put away."40/
Henry S. Ruth,
Jr., one of the Independent Reviewers, asserts: "At least part of the ATF
motivation, even if it never rose to the surface, was to enforce the morals
of our society. To enforce the psyche of right thinking by retaliating
against these odd people."41/ In effect, the Branch Davidians were
a strange and alien culture that had to be destroyed.
BATF Desire to Punish BATF Critic
During the January,
1992 interview with Martin King for the Australian television program "A
Current Affair," David Koresh shared his opinion about guns: "This is not
Europe, not where a country overthrows a bunch of people, takes away their
weapons so the people cannot argue any issues. Guns are the right
of Americans to have. Yeah, we've got a gun here and there.
Most of the guns were sold. A lot of people say: `He's got guns,
that makes him bad, that makes him a cult.'" When asked if he would
use a gun if "someone" trespassed, Koresh answered, "People trespass all
the time. Do we use a gun? No, we don't. Now, they come
in here with a gun and they start shooting at us, what would you do?. .
.Our constitution states every citizen in American has the right to rebuttal
the government. Guns? Yes, we have guns."
Doubtless annoyed,
Davy Aguilera in his February 25, 1993 affidavit mentions that Koresh stated
that the Bible gave him the right to bear arms and then showed him the
Gun Owners Foundation video tape which he wrote "portrayed ATF as an agency
who violated the rights of gun owners by threats and lies." And at
trial undercover agent Robert Rodriquez described with obvious disgust
Koresh's criticism of "silly" gun laws and of BATF as an organization that
violated gun owners' rights.42/ During closing arguments defense
attorney Mike DeGeurin explained, "It's because they believe differently
and they had guns and they were criticizing ATF that this plan grew."43/
Davidians' Perceived Separatist Tendencies
The Davidians
perceived separatist or secessionist tendencies also disturbed BATF agents--and
later the FBI and prosecutors. Sheriff Jack Harwell said, "They were
like living in another little country out there. . .once anyone crossed
that property line out there it would be just like someone invading the
United States."44/ However, Shannon Bright, a drummer who often visited
Mount Carmel, asserted, "They didn't have someone that stood at the gate
and checked everyone who walked in. . .Anyone could walk in peacefully
and walk right back out if they wanted to."45/
Columnist Joseph
Sobran wrote: "We are already being told how threatening David Koresh is
to society at large, when apparently all he ever wanted to do was to secede
from it. And this, I think, is the real nature of a cult: its desire
to withdraw."46/
At trial Robert
Rodriguez described Koresh's comments that the United States was a "dragon"
that would be destroyed by God and said Koresh "denounced its laws and
said that he did not believe in paying taxes."47/ Twice during the
trial prosecutors played Wayne Martin's 9-1-1 statement, "We don't want
any help from your country." Bill Johnston asked the jury, "Can a
group arm themselves and secede from the union, kill agents and claim self-defense?"48/
Dave Hollaway, associate director of the Cause Foundation commented: "The
government cannot allow these kinds of separatists groups, whether they
be white separatist groups or religious separatist groups. They cannot
allow this so they target these individuals."49/ (Even the Democratic
Party-affiliated law firm of Caddell & Conwell, which is filing civil
suits for Davidian survivors and family, noted that BATF was prejudiced
against the Davidians because of their "separatist" beliefs.)50/
BATF Shoddy Intelligence
BATF planners
decided they only could consider a siege if Koresh was arrested away from
Mount Carmel when he was out jogging or in town. Agents believed
that without Koresh's leadership, the other members would offer little
resistance to a BATF search of Mount Carmel. The Treasury report
admits agents received inaccurate information from social worker Joyce
Sparks and undercover agent Robert Rodriguez that Koresh rarely left Mount
Carmel. It also acknowledges that the agents at the undercover house
could not identify who left and entered by automobile.51/ Only after
the raid did BATF receive information that Koresh had left Mount Carmel
a number of times during December, 1992 and January and February, 1993,
visiting places like Wal-Mart, Whataburger, a wrecking yard, and a local
bar.52/
Cult Busters Advised Against Simple Search
Considering
BATF's bias toward paramilitary raids and its desire for a publicity coup,
it is easy to understand why BATF investigators Davy Aguilera and Bill
Buford accepted so uncritically cult buster "scare stories" which reinforced
their commitment to such a raid. Marc Breault writes in his diary
entry of January 8, 1993 that "ATF" asked him, "If Vernon received a summons
to answer questions regarding firearms, would he show up?" Breault
answered, "No way." ATF asked, "If the good guys came with a search
warrant, would Vernon allow it?" Breault gave a false version of
Koresh's theology when he answered: "There is a considerable amount of
danger because Vernon feels that since he is Jesus Christ, he has already
died. Therefore he can skip that phase of things. Since he
does not have to die, there is no resurrection and therefore he may well
feel he can start shooting beforehand."53/ Social worker Joyce Sparks'
had warned BATF, "If you try to serve your warrant with force they are
going to get your guns and they are going to shoot you."54/
Breault falsely insisted Davidians would resist any service.
Breault similarly
had informed the U.S. Embassy in Australia in February, 1992 that "there
would be a shootout with authorities if they attempt to enter the cult's
Waco property to take away any of the children now living there, or investigate
living conditions."55/ This had not happened when social workers
and local sheriffs visited Mount Carmel, yet BATF heeded Breault's questionable
advice. Doubtless, cult buster Rick Ross also was telling BATF investigators
what he told the Waco Tribune-Herald--that Koresh was violent and dangerous.
BATF also was
spooked by Ross-influenced David Block's allegation Koresh urged Davidians
to be "ready to fight and resist" any armed attack.56/ BATF agent
Lowell Sprague testified during the trial that "raid planners" were convinced
that since they had weapons, the Davidians would "make a stand based on
their religious beliefs."57/
This cult buster-induced
belief that Koresh would not cooperate was communicated all the way to
the top. Chief of Public Relations Jack Killorin claimed after the
raid that Koresh was "sworn to resistance" and it was only prudent to have
firepower.58/ And David C. Troy, chief of BATF's intelligence division,
told a House Ways and Means subcommittee: "Once we had probable cause (to
arrest him), he was so kinked up over government. . .that he would not
come off the compound. . .And the people behind Vernon Howell were just
as violent."59/ However, it is clear that cult busters were the ones
who had BATF "kinked up" over David Koresh!
Cult Busters' Mass Suicide Scare Stories
The Treasury report
asserts that one major reason for a paramilitary raid was former Davidians
assertions current Davidians might commit "mass suicide" should the government
attempt a siege. Not surprisingly, Marc Breault promoted this idea
"most forcefully."60/ In fact, the Treasury report asserts, "The
planners ultimately rejected the siege option mainly because the intelligence
obtained in January from former cult members. . .Most significantly, they
noted the distinct danger that Koresh would respond to a siege by leading
his followers in mass suicide."61/ Doubtless, Rick Ross also promoted
his "Jim Jones" comparison. However, at trial raid planner Bill Buford
never mentioned mass suicide as a serious consideration.
Failed Cult Buster Child Abuse Allegation
According to the
Treasury report, BATF attempted to convince Texas Department of Protective
and Regulatory Services to summon Koresh to town for a meeting so that
BATF could arrest him, but they refused to become involved. BATF
then tried obtain a Texas arrest warrant for Koresh for sexual activities
with a young girl, but that fell through when she refused to testify.62/
While official
documents conceal her identity, an article in the Waco Tribune-Herald revealed
that it was twelve-year-old Kiri Jewell's allegations against David Koresh
which were investigated in February, 1993 by Texas Child Protective Services.63/
According to the
Justice Department report, on February 22, 1993, this young girl told Texas
Child Protective Services social worker Joyce Sparks "that on one occasion,
when she was ten years old, her mother left her in a motel room with David
Koresh. He was in bed and he told [her] to come over to him.
She got into the bed. David had no pants on. He took off her
panties and touched her and got on top of her. . .We talked about how she
was feeling when this happened and she responded. . .scared. . .scared
but privileged." The report concedes, "This evidence was insufficient
to establish probable cause to indict or prove beyond a reasonable doubt
to convict."64/
Not only did her
father David Jewell take Kiri to state and federal authorities to tell
this story, he exposed her to public scrutiny by allowing her to appear
on a March, 1993 "Donahue" show to talk about her experiences with the
Davidians. On the show Kiri asserted she knew she would one become
Koresh's wife when she turned 13. David Jewell then interjected,
"Quite frankly, there are other incidents that we just really aren't ready
to talk about right now."
One wonders if
Jewell was holding back only because even in those first ten days of the
siege he was negotiating to sell Kiri's alleged story--a young girl having
sex with David Koresh is rescued by her father and talks to BATF agents--to
television. It was an important story line in the NBC-TV television
movie, "In the Line of Duty: Ambush in Waco." Two years later Jewell
again exposed his daughter to public scrutiny on the May 4, 1995 special
"Where Are They Now." Prosecutors obviously did not consider Kiri
Jewell sufficiently credible to bring her to the stand to speak about Koresh's
allegedly abusing her, despite the judge's ruling such evidence was relevant
to proving conspiracy.65/
GOVERNMENT MULTI-TASK FORCE MADE FOR "PARTNERS IN CRIME"
The Treasury report
describes the "multi-task force" of federal, state and local authorities
used to carry out BATF's February 28th raid. While BATF agents from
three Special Response Teams, supported by National Guard helicopters,
carried out the actual raid, the Texas Rangers were relegated to setting
up roadblocks and the McLennan County Sheriff's Department provided "support."66/
(This consisted of three Lieutenants assigned to what were considered "minor"
duties--like answering raid-related 9-1-1 calls to the Waco police.)
At the June 9, 1993 House Appropriations subcommittee hearings, BATF Associate
Director Hartnett explained that a Drug Enforcement Agency team was on
hand to disassemble any methamphetamine laboratory which might be found,
something not mentioned in the Treasury report. He also said that
the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the U.S Marshals Service
were involved.67/
The problem with
such federal, state and local "multi-task forces" is that they make all
participants defacto "partners in crime," should crimes be committed against
citizens--especially if federal agents commit the crimes. National
legislation and federal funding for state and local law enforcement ensure
that many state and local authorities are not very aggressive in preventing
or investigating federal crimes against citizens.
ABUSE OF THE POSSE COMITATUS LAW
The 1878 posse comitatus law, Section 1385 of the U.S. code, states U.S. military forces and state national guards cannot be used as police forces against civilians. However, courts have given law enforcement wide leeway in using military and national guard equipment, facilities and support personnel.68/ More recent modifications of the posse comitatus law (32 U.S.C. §112 and 10 U.S.C. §371) allow the military and national guard to provide "non-reimbursable," i.e., free, support to civilian law enforcement if they are engaged in counter-drug operations. This is just one more example of how the War on Drugs has chipped away at our liberties.
False Drug Manufacturing Allegations
The Treasury report
states BATF wanted to use military training facilities and equipment at
Fort Hood, and Texas National Guard aerial reconnaissance before, and diversionary
helicopters during, the raid. The report goes on to say, "However,
in the absence of a drug nexus, ATF was told by both the U.S. military
and the National Guard that the assistance would be reimbursable."69/
To get that free assistance, BATF constructed drug allegations from dubious
and dated evidence.
Marc Breault had
told BATF agents that David Koresh claimed that after he took over Mount
Carmel from George Roden, "he had found methamphetamine manufacturing facilities
and recipes on the premises." Koresh told Breault he had asked the
local sheriff to take them away, but the sheriff had no record of doing
so.70/ BATF revealed to Congress it knew the identity of the individuals
most likely responsible for building this lab: "convicted narcotics trafficker
Donny Joe Harvey and his associate, Roy Lee Wells, Jr., were verified by
the McLennan County Sheriffs Department as residing at the compound" during
the time Roden was in charge.71/
Undercover agent
Robert Rodriguez told BATF, "Koresh had told him that the Compound would
be a great place for a methamphetamine laboratory because of its location."
(This allegation is mentioned in the Treasury report--but not in the all-important
affidavit for search warrant.) However, if Koresh made such a comment,
it might have been within the context of the drug activities of George
Roden's former tenants.79/
According to information
BATF submitted to Congress, the last Davidian to be convicted on drug charges
was Brad Branch, back in 1983. Two of BATF's other accusations, against
Kathryn Schroeder and Margaret Lawson, were cases of mistaken identity.73/
On the basis of
this dubious information, Army Lieutenant Colonel Walker, who advised BATF
on obtaining "training or equipment or support in a counter-drug operation,"
recommended BATF solicit Texas National Guard services.74/ BATF convinced
the Texas National Guard to do two overflights of the buildings to look
for "hot spots" that might indicate drug laboratory activity. A hot
spot was found but, since it could indicate construction, cooking or other
activities requiring heat, "no official interpretation of the `hot spot'"
was provided.75/ In March, 1993 Davidian Rita Riddle told reporters
that "hot spots" indicated where there were heaters in the house and denied
the existence of any drug labs.84/
Given this dubious
evidence, it is not surprising that in the month after the raid, BATF denied
to reporters that it had used allegations of a drug laboratory to obtain
Texas National Guard helicopters. Press reports that BATF had obtained
the helicopters under "false pretenses" angered Texas Governor Ann Richards.
BATF Associate Director Hartnett sent her a March 27, 1993 memo to assure
her that there had been sufficient evidence to invoke the drug "nexus"
exception to the posse comitatus law and obtain free use of National Guard
helicopters.
BATF used the
same false information to obtained training support from the Army.
In the May, 1995 issue of Soldier of Fortune, James Pate reveals that a
classified teletype message order from then-Brigadier General John M. Pickler
authorizing the use of Special Forces Green Berets to train BATF agents
was based on BATF's assertion Davidians were manufacturing methamphetamines.
It specifies that "intelligence indicates an active methamphetamine lab
and deliveries of the required chemicals to produce synthetic methamphetamine."
Another classified message reveals that BATF told the army that "one of
the separate buildings [is] suspected of containing a meth lab."77/
Questions About Original Written Plans
Also troubling
is BATF and the Treasury Departments' claims that there was no written
plan for the raid on Mount Carmel until February 23, 1993, five days before
the raid. BATF agent Darrell Dyer, who had past military experience,
took it upon himself to write one with agent William Krone. This
plan was not distributed before the raid.78/ Those familiar with
military bureaucracy find it difficult to believe that military commanders
would have advised BATF on obtaining national guard and army support without
such written documentation.
James Pate presents
evidence that there was indeed a written plan, but that it was such a patent
violation of the posse comitatus law that the military, BATF and Treasury
purposely covered up its existence. Pate notes that BATF spokesperson
Jack Killorin referred to a plan that was "months" old. Also, BATF
Deputy Assistant Director Dan Conroy stated, "I want to once and for all,
unequivocally state--the raid plan was submitted. . .It was granted 100
percent by headquarters." Then-Brigadier General John M. Pickler's
order authorizing the use of Green Berets to train BATF agents notes "ATF
has already planned their operation."
Pate goes on to
describe what he believes are the details of the suppressed original raid
plan. A memorandum by Army Major Philip W. Lindley criticizes BATF's
plan for proposing to illegally use Special Forces trainers in a plan where
"civilian targets" are "to be attacked." BATF also requested Special
Forces to be "in proximity" to "the target" during the raid. The
original plan anticipated a significant number of casualties and
BATF wanted access to Bradley vehicles from the start in order to remove
them. Moreover, immediately after the failed raid, BATF again requested
Bradley vehicles and did in fact contemplate a second assault on Mount
Carmel on February 28th with them, something 9-1-1 tapes reveal that Davidians
feared. The FBI prevented such an assault.79/
Questions About Illegal Training
The Treasury report
describes the involvement of Army Special Forces from Fort Bragg in South
Carolina in training BATF agents at Fort Hood. It asserts they simply
constructed stand-alone windows for practicing breaking and entering, outlined
the dimensions of Mount Carmel with marking tape, and gave agents medical
and communications training.80/ In a May, 1994 article James Pate
revealed "military sources" told him that Special Forces trained BATF agents
in the use of flash-bang grenades. Moreover, they allegedly trained
them "after hours" in techniques of "room-clearing, fire-and-maneuver and
building takedown," methods of indiscriminate killing of uncooperative
enemy forces--and "subjects Special Forces are forbidden to teach civilian
law enforcement." Pate writes that a source told him: "Are we worried
about being found out? Of course we're worried. . .The army engaged in
a coverup on this from the moment the news hit the fan about that [ATF]
raid."81/
In May, 1995 Pate
asserted he had further evidence that Special Forces illegally taught "Close
Quarter Combat" to BATF agents, that Green Berets helped write a specific
assault scenario and that after the failed raid they all wrote "cover your
ass" statements denying any culpability. He also named four Green
Berets who were present at Mount Carmel--wearing "civvies"--during the
February 28th raid.82/
At trial BATF
raid planner Bill Buford confirmed that Special Forces trained agents but
asserted that "to the best of my knowledge" no Special Forces had observed
the February 28th raid. However, he said that at least one army medic
had
told him he wished he could do so.83/
All this military
and law enforcement activity seems particularly unnecessary and even frightening,
given David Koresh's exasperated statement on the March 8th home video:
"You could have arrested me jogging as I jogged up and down the road.
You could have arrested me at Walmart. . .Cause this ain't America any
more when the ATF has that kind of power to come into anybody's home and
kick doors down."
1. "Fagan
still irritant for ATF," Waco Tribune-Herald, January 27, 1994.
2. Treasury
Department report, p. 123.
3. Ibid.
pgs. 187-188.
4. Roy Bragg,
"Ex-prosecutor laments agents' `storm trooper' tactics," Houston Chronicle,
March 2, 1993; Clifford Linedecker, pgs. 72-73.
5. June 9,
1994, House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, p. 164.
6. Treasury
Department report, p. 135.
7. Dirk Johnson,
"40 Bodies of Cult Members are Found in Charred Ruins," New York Times,
April 22, 1993, B12.
8. Lexington
(KY) Herald-Leader, March 7, 1993, A2.
9. Treasury
Department report, Appendix D, pgs. 8-9.
10. Clive Doyle interview,
"American Justice" program, "Attack at Waco," August 3, 1994.
11. Treasury Department
report, p. 187; trial transcript, p. 4069.
12. James L. Pate,
July, 1994, p. 48.
13. Treasury Department
report, Appendix D, p. 11.
14. Livingstone
Fagan paper, August, 1994, p. 13.
15. Lee Hancock,
Dallas Morning News, May 13, 1993, 8A; James L. Pate, July, 1994, p. 48;
trial transcript, pgs. 3441-44.
16. "Koresh to
agents: Should have called me," Washington Times, May 26, 1993.
17. Marjorie Thomas
testimony, November 17-18, 1993, p. 207.
18. James L. Pate,
July, 1994, p. 48, 49.
19. Newsweek, March
15, 1993, p. 55.
20. Dr. Robert
Cancro report to the Justice Department in Recommendations of Experts for
Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement after Waco, October 8, 1993, p.
2.
21. Treasury Department
report, p. 38.
22. Trial transcript,
pgs. 2925-2937.
23. Ibid. pgs.
2934-5.
24. Ibid. pgs.
2934-35.
25. Ibid. pg. 2716.
26. Treasury Department
report, p. 38.
27. Ibid. p. 53;
trial transcript, p. 2831.
28. Trial transcript,
pgs. 2927-8, 2756, 2798, 2830.
29. Ibid. pgs.
2927-28.
30. Treasury Department
report, pgs. 38-43.
31. Trial transcript,
p. 2831.
32. Larry Pratt
report, p. 15.
33. Treasury Department
report, p. 62.
34. Ibid. Appendix
B, p. 40.
35. Steve McVicker,
"Interview with Dick DeGuerin," Houston Press, July 22, 1993.
36. Stephen Labaton,
"Firearms Agency Struggles to Rise From Ashes of Waco Raid," New York Times,
November 5, 1993, A21.
37. Trial transcript,
pgs. 2387, 2506.
38. June 9, 1993,
House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, pgs. 144-145.
39. Time, March
15, 1993, p. 39.
40. Marc Breault
and Martin King, p. 299.
41. "American Justice"
program, "Attack at Waco," August 3, 1994.
42. Trial transcript,
pgs.3385-90.
43. Ibid. p. 7279.
44. Daniel Wattenberg,
p. 32.
45. Mark England,
"Still Having Doubts," Waco Tribune-Herald, April 17, 1993.
46. Joseph Sobran,
"Applying the Cult Label," Washington Times, March 22, 1993.
47. Trial transcript,
pgs. 3385-86.
48. Ibid. p. 7083-84.
49. Marc R. Masferrer,
"Lessons from the botched Mount Carmel raid," Waco Tribune-Herald, February
27, 1994, 4A.
50. Caddell &
Conwell lawsuit, (July 26, 1994), p. 78.
51. Treasury Department
report, pgs. 136-40.
52. Margy G. Gotschall,
"A Marriage Made In Hell," National Review, April 4, 1994; trial transcript,
pgs. 6713-14.
53. Marc Breault
and Martin King, pgs. 306-07.
54. Joyce Sparks
interview on ABC-TV's "Primetime Live" show, January 6, 1994.
55. Gustav Nieguhr
and Pierre Thomas, April 25, 1993, A20.
56. Treasury Department
report, p. 45.
57. Trial transcript,
p. 2251.
58. "A Botched
Mission in Waco, Texas," U.S. News and World Report, March 5, 1993.
59. Associated
Press wire story, April 22, 1993, 13:04 EDT.
60. Treasury Department
report, p. 46.
61. Ibid. p. 141.
62. Ibid. p. 64.
63. Darlene McCormick,
October
10, 1993.
64. Justice Department
report, pgs. 219.
65. Trial transcript,
pgs. 4421-22, 4716.
66. Treasury Department
report, p. 79.
67. June 9, 1993,
House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, p. 77-78.
68. June 9, 1993,
House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, p. 342.
69. Treasury Department
report, p. 213.
70. Ibid. p. 30.
71. June 9, 1993,
House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, p. 188-189.
72. Treasury Department
report, p. 212.
73. June 9, 1993
House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, pgs. 188-189; family member,
private communication.
74. Ibid. pgs.
177-178.
75. Treasury Department
report, p. 213.
76. J. Michael
Kennedy and Louis Sahagun, "Sect member says helicopters shot at compound
in gun battle," Los Angeles Times, March 30, 1993, A17.
77. James L. Pate,
"No Peace without Justice," Soldier of Fortune, May, 1995, p. 82.
78. Treasury report,
pgs. 207-208.
79. James L. Pate,
May, 1995, pgs. 58-61.
80. Treasury Department
report, pgs. 73, 78 and Appendix B, p. 56.
81. James L. Pate,
"Special Forces Involved In Waco Raid!" Soldier of Fortune, May, 1994,
p. 35-36.
82. James L. Pate,
May, 1995, pgs. 60-61, 94-95.
83. Trial transcript,
pgs. 2811-12.